|
|
|
|
|
Last modified SpiriLogic
Fundamentals and appliance in real world... People
often ask us: what kind of religion
are you? Are you
a sect? (Maybe because the name ‘SpiriLogic’ sounds a bit like ‘Scientology’). The simple
answer is: no, we are not a religion. We do not ’follow’ more non-religion
‘thinkings’ such as anthroposophy
or communism either. The same goes for Buddhism, or the religions
such as Islam, Christianity or Judaism. We believe
in the words of goodness... We believe
in the essence of Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism, which -we think- got overlaid
with so much additional writings and information, that the kernel did get
lost, which for us is (called GoodValues or GoodFundamentals): Overview
GoodFundamentals:
That’s it! No more words aren’t actually necessary do describe were we stand for and
how. Off course the above mentioned principles can be further translated into
various derivative principles, such as ‘pride is nogood’ (trespasses GV1.5).
Isn’t ironic, that for example ‘pride’ is so often used in our society? Our
leaders say “be proud of our company”,
we say to our children “I’m so proud of
you”, etc., and thus bringing destructiveness in our society. Pride is the most deadly sin we learn at the same time.
Ironic, dual morality in society (which trespasses GV1.2 and is therefore
nogood too). You can see that the goodvalues are not ‘new’, but are the same as
mentioned in the ten
commandments (words of g(o)od to Mozes), which form the basis
for the Islam, Christianity and Judaism, combined with some Buddhistic elements.
So SpiriLogic members can be a Christen when Christianity practises the
goodvalues, can be a Moslim when Moslims practise the good values, etc. We
don’t mind, as long as the goodvalues are really put in practise. Analysis - keep the eyes
wide open How to put these goodvalues or principles in practise? The idea behind it
is quite simple: we look at society with the above mentioned principles in
mind. When a thing (eg. the concept ‘stock’ (financial product))
does trespass the above mentioned principles, we think “hey, why is that?”,
than we go back to the roots of the concepts ‘stock’ to find out why society
actually invented such a concept. Why did it get into our world? Than we
analyse whether it serves society nowadays, and thus we define the
‘underlying requirements’ of the thing. Quite often the result of the analysis phase is that the thing was
initially ‘good’, but got worse and worse through the years due to all kind
of negative things (greed, lying, etc.). A nice overview of these things can
be found in Christianity (the
Seven Sins) or the described destructive emotions (we call them destructicons)
in the
book Daniel Goleman
wrote after having dialogues with the Dalai Lama. Redesign and implement So knowing what we actually want and what is broken about the thing, we
can redesign and implement it. Sometimes it is better or necessary to just
abandon the thing and introduce a better (more good) thing. Only than we can
remove the badness of the thing that merely demolishes our society instead of
bringing welfare too all... Two
examples of such things: turn stocks
into goodstocks and redesign
the cure for depression (the word ‘depression’ is sick). |